Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.07.26.501570

ABSTRACT

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is now globally dominant but despite high prevalence little is known regarding the immune response in children. We determined the antibody and cellular immune response following Omicron infection in children aged 6-14 years and related this to prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination status. Primary Omicron infection elicited a weak antibody response and only 53% of children developed detectable neutralising antibodies. In contrast, children with secondary Omicron infection following prior infection with a pre-Omicron variant developed 24-fold higher antibody titres and neutralisation of Omicron. Vaccination elicited the highest levels of antibody response and was also strongly immunogenic following prior natural infection with Omicron. Cellular responses against Omicron were robust and broadly equivalent in all study groups. These data reveal that primary Omicron infection elicits a weak humoral immune response in children and may presage a clinical profile of recurrent infection as seen with antecedent seasonal coronaviruses. Vaccination may represent the most effective approach to control infection whilst cellular immunity should offer strong clinical protection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
2.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1108654.v1

ABSTRACT

We present a comprehensive analysis of antibody and cellular responses in children aged 12-16 years who received COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 (n=6) or mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, n=9) using a 12-week extended-interval schedule. mRNA vaccination of seropositive children induces high antibody levels, with one dose, but a second dose is required in infection-naïve children. Following a second ChAdOx1 dose, antibody titres were higher than natural infection, but lower than mRNA vaccination. Vaccination induced live virus neutralising antibodies against Alpha, Beta and Delta variants, however, a second dose is required in infection-naïve children. We found higher T-cell responses following mRNA vaccination than ChAdOx1. Phenotyping of responses showed predominantly early effector-memory CD4 T cell populations, with a type-1 cytotoxic cytokine signature, with IL-10. These data demonstrate mRNA vaccination induces a co-ordinated superior antibody and robust cellular responses in children. Seronegative children require a prime-boost regime for optimal protection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
3.
ssrn; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3895741

ABSTRACT

Background: Following the full re-opening of schools in England and emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant, we investigated the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in students and staff who were contacts of a confirmed case in a school bubble (school groupings with limited interactions), along with their household members. Methods: Primary and secondary school bubbles were recruited into sKIDsBUBBLE after being sent home to self-isolate following a confirmed case of COVID-19 in the bubble. Bubble participants and their household members were sent home-testing kits comprising nasal swabs for RT-PCR testing and whole genome sequencing, and oral fluid swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results: During November-December 2020, 14 bubbles were recruited from 7 schools, including 269 bubble contacts (248 students, 21 staff) and 823 household contacts (524 adults, 299 children). The secondary attack rate was 10.0% (6/60) in primary and 3.9% (4/102) in secondary school students, compared to 6.3% (1/16) and 0% (0/1) among staff, respectively. The incidence rate for household contacts of primary school students was 6.6% (12/183) and 3.7% (1/27) for household contacts of primary school staff. In secondary schools, this was 3.5% (11/317) and 0% (0/1), respectively. Household contacts were more likely to test positive if their bubble contact tested positive although there were new infections among household contacts of uninfected bubble contacts. Interpretation: Compared to other institutional settings, the overall risk of secondary infection in school bubbles and their household contacts was low. Our findings are important for developing evidence-based infection prevention guidelines for educational settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
4.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.07.14.21260496

ABSTRACT

Background In England, the rapid spread of the SARS-Cov-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant from November 2020 led to national lockdown, including school closures in January 2021. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroprevalence and seroconversion in students and staff when secondary schools reopened in March 2021. Methods Public Health England initiated SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in 18 secondary schools across six regions in September 2020. Participants provided nasal swabs for RT-PCR and blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the beginning (September 2020) and end (December 2020) of the autumn term and at the start of the spring term (March 2021). Findings In March 2021, 1895 participants (1100 students, 795 staff) were tested; 5.6% (61/1094) students and 4.4% (35/792) staff had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 2020 and March 2021. Nucleoprotein antibody seroprevalence was 36.3% (370/1018) in students and 31.9% (245/769) in staff, while spike protein antibody prevalence was 39.5% (402/1018) and 59.8% (459/769), respectively, similar to regional community seroprevalence. Between December 2020 and March 2021 (median 15.9 weeks), 14.8% (97/656; 95% CI: 12.2-17.7) students and 10.0% (59/590; 95% CI: 7.7-12.7) staff seroconverted. Weekly seroconversion rates were similar from September to December 2020 (8.0/1000) and from December 2020 to March 2021 (7.9/1000; students: 9.3/1,000; staff: 6.3/1,000). Interpretation By March 2021, a third of secondary school students and staff had serological evidence of prior infection based on N-antibody seropositivity, and an additional third of staff had evidence of vaccine-induced immunity based on S-antibody seropositivity. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the Delta variant. Research in Context Evidence Before this study The Alpha variant is 30-70% more transmissible than previously circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains in adults and children. One outbreak investigation in childcare settings estimated similar secondary attack rates with the Alpha variant in children and adults. There are limited data on the impact of the Alpha variant in educational settings. In England, cases in primary and secondary school aged children increased rapidly from late November 2020 and peaked at the end of December 2020, leading to national lockdown including school closures. Added Value of This Study Seroconversion rates in staff and students during December 2020 to March 2021, when the Alpha variant was the primary circulating strain in England, were similar to the period between September 2020 and December 2020 when schools were fully open for in-person teaching. By March 2021, a third of students overall and more than half the students in some regions were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Among staff, too, around a third had evidence of prior infection on serological testing and a further third had vaccine-induced immunity. Implications of all the Available Evidence SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence was high among secondary school students in March 2021 and is likely to be higher following the emergence of an even more transmissible Delta variant in May 2021. Education staff are increasingly being protected by the national COVID-19 immunisation programme. These findings have important implications for countries that are considering vaccination of children to control the pandemic


Subject(s)
COVID-19
5.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.06.03.21258289

ABSTRACT

Objective The main objective was to assess implementation of and ease of implementation of control measures in schools as reported by staff and parents. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Staff and parents/guardian participants in the 132 primary schools and 20 secondary schools participating in sKIDs and sKIDsPLUS surveillances. Main outcome measure Prevalence of control measures implemented in Autumn 2020, parental and staff perception of ease of implementation and acceptability of conducting school surveillance studies. Results In total, 56/152 (37%) schools participating in Public Health England's sKIDs study of COVID in schools accepted the invitation to participate in the survey. By 28 December 2020, 1,953 parent and 986 staff respondents had completed the online questionnaire. While more than half the parents were positive about their children returning to school, roughly a third reported being a little anxious. 90% and 82% of primary and secondary school parents were either completely or partly reassured by the preventive measures implemented in their schools. Among staff, 80% of primary staff and 87% of secondary school staff felt that they were at higher risk of COVID-19 because of their profession; only 52% of primary school staff and 38% of secondary school staff reportedly felt safe. According to the teaching staff, most preventive measures were well-implemented apart from requiring 2-metre distancing between staff. For students, maintaining the 2-metre distance was reported to be particularly difficult. By extension, secondary schools also struggled to maintain small groups at all times or ensuring that the same staff were assigned to each student group (a problem also commonly reported by parents). Conclusions Variable implementation of infection control measures was reported by staff and parents. Whilst the majority were not worried about returning to school, some parents and staff, were concerned about returning to school and the risks posed to children, staff and household members.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infections
6.
- The COvid-19 Multi-omics Blood ATlas (COMBAT) Consortium; David J Ahern; Zhichao Ai; Mark Ainsworth; Chris Allan; Alice Allcock; Azim Ansari; Carolina V Arancibia-Carcamo; Dominik Aschenbrenner; Moustafa Attar; J. Kenneth Baillie; Eleanor Barnes; Rachael Bashford-Rogers; Archana Bashyal; Sally Beer; Georgina Berridge; Amy Beveridge; Sagida Bibi; Tihana Bicanic; Luke Blackwell; Paul Bowness; Andrew Brent; Andrew Brown; John Broxholme; David Buck; Katie L Burnham; Helen Byrne; Susana Camara; Ivan Candido Ferreira; Philip Charles; Wentao Chen; Yi-Ling Chen; Amanda Chong; Elizabeth Clutterbuck; Mark Coles; Christopher P Conlon; Richard Cornall; Adam P Cribbs; Fabiola Curion; Emma E Davenport; Neil Davidson; Simon Davis; Calliope Dendrou; Julie Dequaire; Lea Dib; James Docker; Christina Dold; Tao Dong; Damien Downes; Alexander Drakesmith; Susanna J Dunachie; David A Duncan; Chris Eijsbouts; Robert Esnouf; Alexis Espinosa; Rachel Etherington; Benjamin Fairfax; Rory Fairhead; Hai Fang; Shayan Fassih; Sally Felle; Maria Fernandez Mendoza; Ricardo Ferreira; Roman Fischer; Thomas Foord; Aden Forrow; John Frater; Anastasia Fries; Veronica Gallardo Sanchez; Lucy Garner; Clementine Geeves; Dominique Georgiou; Leila Godfrey; Tanya Golubchik; Maria Gomez Vazquez; Angie Green; Hong Harper; Heather A Harrington; Raphael Heilig; Svenja Hester; Jennifer Hill; Charles Hinds; Clare Hird; Ling-Pei Ho; Renee Hoekzema; Benjamin Hollis; Jim Hughes; Paula Hutton; Matthew Jackson; Ashwin Jainarayanan; Anna James-Bott; Kathrin Jansen; Katie Jeffery; Elizabeth Jones; Luke Jostins; Georgina Kerr; David Kim; Paul Klenerman; Julian C Knight; Vinod Kumar; Piyush Kumar Sharma; Prathiba Kurupati; Andrew Kwok; Angela Lee; Aline Linder; Teresa Lockett; Lorne Lonie; Maria Lopopolo; Martyna Lukoseviciute; Jian Luo; Spyridoula Marinou; Brian Marsden; Jose Martinez; Philippa Matthews; Michalina Mazurczyk; Simon McGowan; Stuart McKechnie; Adam Mead; Alexander J Mentzer; Yuxin Mi; Claudia Monaco; Ruddy Montadon; Giorgio Napolitani; Isar Nassiri; Alex Novak; Darragh O'Brien; Daniel O'Connor; Denise O'Donnell; Graham Ogg; Lauren Overend; Inhye Park; Ian Pavord; Yanchun Peng; Frank Penkava; Mariana Pereira Pinho; Elena Perez; Andrew J Pollard; Fiona Powrie; Bethan Psaila; T. Phuong Quan; Emmanouela Repapi; Santiago Revale; Laura Silva-Reyes; Jean-Baptiste Richard; Charlotte Rich-Griffin; Thomas Ritter; Christine S Rollier; Matthew Rowland; Fabian Ruehle; Mariolina Salio; Stephen N Sansom; Alberto Santos Delgado; Tatjana Sauka-Spengler; Ron Schwessinger; Giuseppe Scozzafava; Gavin Screaton; Anna Seigal; Malcolm G Semple; Martin Sergeant; Christina Simoglou Karali; David Sims; Donal Skelly; Hubert Slawinski; Alberto Sobrinodiaz; Nikolaos Sousos; Lizzie Stafford; Lisa Stockdale; Marie Strickland; Otto Sumray; Bo Sun; Chelsea Taylor; Stephen Taylor; Adan Taylor; Supat Thongjuea; Hannah Thraves; John A Todd; Adriana Tomic; Orion Tong; Amy Trebes; Dominik Trzupek; Felicia A Tucci; Lance Turtle; Irina Udalova; Holm Uhlig; Erinke van Grinsven; Iolanda Vendrell; Marije Verheul; Alexandru Voda; Guanlin Wang; Lihui Wang; Dapeng Wang; Peter Watkinson; Robert Watson; Michael Weinberger; Justin Whalley; Lorna Witty; Katherine Wray; Luzheng Xue; Hing Yuen Yeung; Zixi Yin; Rebecca K Young; Jonathan Youngs; Ping Zhang; Yasemin-Xiomara Zurke.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.05.11.21256877

ABSTRACT

Treatment of severe COVID-19 is currently limited by clinical heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of potentially druggable immune mediators of disease. To advance this, we present a comprehensive multi-omic blood atlas in patients with varying COVID-19 severity and compare with influenza, sepsis and healthy volunteers. We identify immune signatures and correlates of host response. Hallmarks of disease severity revealed cells, their inflammatory mediators and networks as potential therapeutic targets, including progenitor cells and specific myeloid and lymphocyte subsets, features of the immune repertoire, acute phase response, metabolism and coagulation. Persisting immune activation involving AP-1/p38MAPK was a specific feature of COVID-19. The plasma proteome enabled sub-phenotyping into patient clusters, predictive of severity and outcome. Tensor and matrix decomposition of the overall dataset revealed feature groupings linked with disease severity and specificity. Our systems-based integrative approach and blood atlas will inform future drug development, clinical trial design and personalised medicine approaches for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sepsis
7.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.04.12.21255275

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 infection is generally mild or asymptomatic in children but the biological basis for this is unclear. We studied the profile of antibody and cellular immunity in children aged 3-11 years in comparison with adults. Antibody profiles in children were strong with high titres against spike protein and receptor binding domain (RBD). SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in children strongly boosted antibody responses against seasonal beta-coronaviruses, partly through cross-recognition of the S2 domain, indicating a broad humoral response that was not seen in adults. T cell responses against spike were also >2-fold higher in children compared to adults and displayed a strong Th1 cytokine profile. SARS-CoV-2 spike-reactive cellular responses were present in more than half the seronegative children, indicating pre-existing cross-reactive responses or sensitization against SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, all children retained high antibody titres and cellular responses for more than 6 months after infection whilst relative antibody waning was seen in adults. Children thus distinctly generate robust, cross-reactive and sustained immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection with focussed specificity against spike protein. These observations demonstrate several novel features of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in children and may provide insights into relative clinical protection in this group. Such information on the profile of natural infection will help to guide the introduction of vaccination regimens into the paediatric population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
8.
ssrn; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3803334

ABSTRACT

Background: The reopening of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about widespread infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings. In June 2020, Public Health England (PHE) initiated prospective national surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in primary schools across England (sKIDs). We used this opportunity to assess the feasibility and agreeability of large-scale surveillance and testing for SARS-CoV-2 infections in school among staff, parents and students.Methods: Staff and students in 131 primary schools were asked to complete a questionnaire at recruitment and provide weekly nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing (n=86) or swabs with blood samples for antibody testing (n=45) at the beginning and end the summer half-term. In six blood sampling schools, students were asked to complete a pictorial questionnaire before and after their investigations.Results: In total, 134 children aged 4-7 years (n=40) or 8-11 years (n=95) completed the pictorial questionnaire fully or partially. Prior to sampling, oral fluid sampling was the most acceptable test (107/132, 81%) followed by throat swabs (80/134, 59%), nose swabs (77/132, 58%), and blood tests (48/130, 37%). Younger students were more nervous about all tests than older students but, after completing their tests, most children reported a “better than expected” experience with all the investigations. Students were more likely to agree to additional testing for nose swabs (93/113, 82%) and oral fluid (93/114, 82%), followed by throat swabs (85/113, 75%) and blood tests (72/108, 67%). Parents (n=3,994) and staff (n=2,580) selected a preference for weekly testing with nose swabs, throat swabs or oral fluid sampling, although staff were more flexible about testing frequency. Conclusions: Primary school staff and parents were supportive of regular tests for SARS-CoV-2 and selected a preference for weekly testing. Children preferred nose swabs and oral fluids over throat swabs or blood sampling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
9.
ssrn; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.3766774

ABSTRACT

Background: Many countries re-opened schools after national lockdown but little is known about the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in educational settings. Public Health England conducted six-month prospective surveillance in primary schools across England. Methods: The COVID-19 Surveillance in School KIDs (sKIDs) study included two arms: weekly nasal swabs for ≥4 weeks following partial reopening during the summer half-term (June to mid-July 2020) and blood sampling with nasal and throat swabs at the beginning and end of the summer half-term, and, following full reopening in September 2020, at the end of the autumn term (end-November 2020). Results: In round 1, 12,026 participants (59.1% students, 40.9% staff) in 131 schools had 43,091 swabs taken. Weekly SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were 3.9 (1/25,537; 95% CI, 0.10-21.8) and 11.3 (2/17,554; 95% CI, 1.4-41.2) per 100,000 students and staff. At recruitment, N-antibody positivity in 45 schools was 11.1% (91/817; 95%CI, 9.2-13.5%) in students and 15.1% (209/1381; 95%CI, 13.3-17.1%) in staff, similar to local community seroprevalence. Seropositivity was not associated with school attendance during lockdown or staff contact with students. Round 2 participation was 73.7% (1,619/2,198) and only five (4 students, 1 staff) seroconverted. In round 3, when 61.9% (1,361/2,198) of round 1 participants were re-tested, seroconversion rates were 3.4% (19/562; 95%CI, 2.0-5.2) in students and 3.9% (36/930; 95%CI, 2.7-5.3) in staff. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection rates, assessed using nasal swabs for acute infection and serum antibodies for prior infection, were low following partial and full reopening of primary schools in England.Funding Statement: This surveillance was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).Declaration of Interests: None to declare.Ethics Approval Statement: The surveillance protocol was approved by the Public Health England Research Ethics Governance Group (R&D REGG Ref: NR0209, 16 May 2020).


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL